What is Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome
Mask and Vaccine Mandates a Sick and Twisted Game of Simon Says!!
Update on the September 20, 2023 WHO and UN General Assembly Meeting
The recent events surrounding the World Health Organization (WHO) and its global health agenda have raised significant concerns about transparency, accountability, and the potential ramifications for nations worldwide. In a candid discussion on the "Medical Truth Podcast”, host James Egidio and guest James Roguski dissected the recent developments in the WHO's actions and highlighted the need for vigilance and public awareness.
Theatrics at the United Nations:
At the forefront of these concerns is the WHO's attempt to orchestrate a global health council, where national leaders would collectively agree to its proposed agenda. The WHO aimed to give the impression that the entire international community was aligned with its vision, but this attempt was far from successful.
On September 20th, 2023, the WHO staged a meeting at the United Nations, seemingly to pass a declaration with unanimous consent. However, this was a facade, as it was not an official UN General Assembly vote. Rather, it was a theatrical performance designed to create a false sense of unity. Thankfully, 11 nations saw through this charade and expressed their dissatisfaction, demanding that any declaration be presented at the full General Assembly for proper consideration.
Amendments to International Health Regulations:
Meanwhile, in a less-publicized track, the WHO had already adopted amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) in May 2022. These amendments, which went mostly unnoticed by the public, are binding on all member states. The WHO's power to make these changes without the need for Senate approval or consent is deeply concerning.
These amendments are not subject to congressional oversight or approval. In essence, they grant the WHO significant control over global health policies without adequate checks and balances.
The Secretive 300+ Amendments:
The most troubling aspect is that the WHO is currently pushing forward with over 300 additional amendments to the IHR, which they have kept shrouded in secrecy. These amendments were submitted in September 2022 and are being discussed behind closed doors.
The timeline for these amendments is tight, with a final decision expected in May 2024. If adopted, they will have a profound impact on global health policies, yet they will not return to the Senate for approval.
What Can Concerned Citizens Do?:
James Roguski emphasizes the importance of citizen engagement in holding elected officials accountable and ensuring that the global health agenda serves the interests of the people rather than secretive globalist agendas.
1. Contact Your Representatives: Engage with your congressional representatives and senators. Inquire if they support HR 79, the WHO Withdrawal Act, which would instruct the president to withdraw the United States from the WHO.
2. Demand Transparency: Urge your elected officials to prioritize transparency in international health regulations and to reject secretive processes.
3. Stay Informed: Continue to educate yourself about global health issues and closely monitor developments in international health regulations.
4. Advocate for Public Health: Support policies and initiatives that prioritize public health, transparency, and accountability.
Amendments to International Health Regulations:
One of the most significant concerns is the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR). These amendments aim to create a global digital health certification network, which would include vaccine certificates, testing certificates, prophylaxis certificates, recovery certificates, traveler locator forms, and passenger health declarations, all tied to QR codes. The intention behind this network is to facilitate safe travel by verifying individuals' health statuses. Critics argue that this system could lead to personal privacy issues and raise questions about the definition of "safe" and "effective" in vaccines and treatments.
The Framework Convention for Pandemic Response:
The Framework Convention for Pandemic Response, often referred to as the WHO CA+, is a complex endeavor that seeks to address pandemic prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery. This convention is designed as a framework, with many details left to be determined later by a conference of the parties. It involves various stakeholders, including nations, corporations, United Nations agencies, and foundations, in making protocols for pandemic-related activities.
The framework convention also proposes building out laboratory networks for genomic sequencing to identify pathogens with pandemic potential. The idea is to surveil the environment, including sewage systems and even wildlife, to detect potential threats to human health. Critics argue that this approach may lead to the creation of pathogens and countermeasures, posing potential risks.
Conclusion:
The WHO's global health agenda spans multiple tracks, from promoting international cooperation through declarations to introducing amendments to international health regulations and creating a framework convention for pandemic response. While these initiatives aim to address global health challenges, concerns have arisen regarding individual freedoms, privacy, and the potential misuse of these systems. As discussions surrounding these initiatives continue, it is essential for governments, experts, and the public to engage in open dialogue to ensure that global health efforts align with the best interests of humanity.
Share this post